Paper detail

G64.5+0.9, a new shell supernova remnant with unusual central emission

We present observations between 1.4 and 18 GHz confirming that G64.5+0.9 is new Galactic shell supernova remnant, using the Very Large Array and the Arcminute Microkelvin Imager. The remnant is a shell ~8 arcmin in diameter with a spectral index of alpha = 0.47 +/- 0.03 (with alpha defined such that flux density S varies with frequency nu as S proportional to nu to the power of -alpha). There is also emission near the centre of the shell, ~1 arcmin in extent, with a spectral index of alpha = 0.81 +/- 0.02. We do not find any evidence for spectral breaks for either source within our frequency range. The nature of the central object is unclear and requires further investigation, but we argue that is most unlikely to be extragalactic. It is difficult to avoid the conclusion that it is associated with the shell, although its spectrum is very unlike that of known pulsar wind nebulae.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access18 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.