Paper detail

G221 Interpretations of the Diboson and Wh Excesses

Based on an $SU(2) \times SU(2) \times U(1)$ effective theory framework (aka $G221$ models), we investigate a leptophobic $SU(2)_L \times SU(2)_R \times U(1)_{B-L}$ model, in which the right-handed $W^\prime$ boson has the mass of around 2 TeV, and predominantly couples to the standard model quarks and the gauge-Higgs sector. This model could explain the resonant excesses near 2 TeV reported by the ATLAS collaboration in the $WZ$ production decaying into hadronic final states, and by the CMS collaboration in the $Wh$ channel decaying into $b\bar{b}\ellν$ and dijet final state. After imposing the constraints from the electroweak precision and current LHC data, we find that to explain the three excesses in $WZ$, $Wh$ and dijet channels, the $SU(2)_R$ coupling strength $g_R$ favors the range of $0.47 \sim 0.68$. In this model, given a benchmark 2 TeV $W'$ mass, the $Z'$ mass is predicted to be around $2.9$ TeV if the doublet Higgs (LPD) is used to break the G221 symmetry, consistent with the 2.9 TeV $e^+e^-$ event recently observed at CMS. A $3 \sim 5$ TeV mass is typically predicted for the triplet Higgs (LPT) symmetry breaking scenario, can also be consistent with a 2.9 TeV dilepton signal. These signatures can be further explored by the LHC Run-2 data.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.