Paper detail

G-protein coupled receptor subfamily identification using phylogenetic comparison of gene and species trees

Most approaches to prediction of protein function from primary structure are based on similarity between the query sequence and sequences of known function. This approach, however, disregards the occurrence of gene duplication (paralogy) or convergent evolution of the genes. The analysis of correlated proteins that share a common domain, taking into consideration the evolutionary history of genes under study may provide a more reliable annotation of predicted proteins with unknown function. A computer program that enables real-time comparison of 'gene trees' with 'species trees' was developed. The Phylogenetic Genome Annotator (PGA) performs a profile based multiple sequence alignment of a set of sequences that share a common domain to generate a phylogenetic gene tree, which is compared to the species phylogeny inferred from aligned ribossomal RNA data. The correlated protein domains are then displayed side-by-side with the phylogeny of the corresponding species. The statistical support of gene clusters (branches) is given by the quartet puzzling method. This analysis readily discriminates paralogs from orthologs, enabling the identification of proteins originated by gene duplications and the prediction of possible functional divergence in groups of similar sequences. The tool was tested in three distinct subfamilies of the G-protein coupled receptor superfamily. In the analysed datasets, the paralogy prediction agreed with the known subfamily grouping, suggesting that subfamily divergence was facilitated by duplication events in the ancestral nodes.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.