Paper detail

$G$-minimality and invariant negative spheres in $G$-Hirzebruch surfaces

In this paper a study of $G$-minimality, i.e., minimality of four-manifolds equipped with an action of a finite group $G$, is initiated. We focus on cyclic actions on $CP^2\# \overline{CP^2}$, and our work shows that even in this simple setting, the comparison of $G$-minimality in the various categories, i.e., locally linear, smooth, and symplectic, is already delicate and interesting. For example, we show that if a symplectic $Z_n$-action on $CP^2\# \overline{CP^2}$ has an invariant locally linear topological $(-1)$-sphere, then it must admit an invariant symplectic $(-1)$-sphere, provided that $n=2$ or $n$ is odd. For the case where $n>2$ and even, the same conclusion holds under a stronger assumption, i.e., the invariant $(-1)$-sphere is smoothly embedded. Along the way of these proofs we develop certain techniques for producing embedded invariant $J$-holomorphic two-spheres of self-intersection $-r$ under a weaker assumption of an invariant smooth $(-r)$-sphere for $r$ relatively small compared with the group order $n$. We then apply the techniques to give a classification of $G$-Hirzebruch surfaces (i.e., Hirzebruch surfaces equipped with a homologically trivial, holomorphic $G=Z_n$-action) up to orientation-preserving equivariant diffeomorphisms. The main issue of the classification is to distinguish non-diffeomorphic $G$-Hirzebruch surfaces which have the same fixed-point set structure. An interesting discovery is that these non-diffeomorphic $G$-Hirzebruch surfaces have distinct equivariant Gromov-Taubes invariant, giving the first examples of such kind. Going back to the original question of $G$-minimality, we show that for $G=Z_n$, a minimal rational $G$-surface is minimal as a symplectic $G$-manifold if and only if it is minimal as a smooth $G$-manifold.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.