Paper detail

Future Collider Signatures of the Possible 750 GeV State

If the recent indications of a possible state $Φ$ with mass $\sim 750$ GeV decaying into two photons reported by ATLAS and CMS in LHC collisions at 13 TeV were to become confirmed, the prospects for future collider physics at the LHC and beyond would be affected radically, as we explore in this paper. Even minimal scenarios for the $Φ$ resonance and its $γγ$ decays require additional particles with masses $\gtrsim \frac12 m_Φ$. We consider here two benchmark scenarios that exemplify the range of possibilities: one in which $Φ$ is a singlet scalar or pseudoscalar boson whose production and $γγ$ decays are due to loops of coloured and charged fermions, and another benchmark scenario in which $Φ$ is a superposition of (nearly) degenerate CP-even and CP-odd Higgs bosons in a (possibly supersymmetric) two-Higgs doublet model also with additional fermions to account for the $γγ$ decay rate. We explore the implications of these benchmark scenarios for the production of $Φ$ and its new partners at colliders in future runs of the LHC and beyond, at higher-energy $pp$ colliders and at $e^+ e^-$ and $γγ$ colliders, with emphasis on the bosonic partners expected in the doublet scenario and the fermionic partners expected in both scenarios.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.