Paper detail

Fusion bases as facets of polytopes

A new way of constructing fusion bases (i.e., the set of inequalities governing fusion rules) out of fusion elementary couplings is presented. It relies on a polytope reinterpretation of the problem: the elementary couplings are associated to the vertices of the polytope while the inequalities defining the fusion basis are the facets. The symmetry group of the polytope associated to the lowest rank affine Lie algebras is found; it has order 24 for $\su(2)$, 432 for $\su(3)$ and quite surprisingly, it reduces to 36 for $\su(4)$, while it is only of order 4 for $\sp(4)$. This drastic reduction in the order of the symmetry group as the algebra gets more complicated is rooted in the presence of many linear relations between the elementary couplings that break most of the potential symmetries. For $\su(2)$ and $\su(3)$, it is shown that the fusion-basis defining inequalities can be generated from few (1 and 2 respectively) elementary ones. For $\su(3)$, new symmetries of the fusion coefficients are found.

preprint2002arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.