Paper detail

Furthering Baseline Core Lucid Standard Specification in the Context of the History of Lucid, Intensional Programming, and Context-Aware Computing

This work is multifold. We review the historical literature on the Lucid programming language, its dialects, intensional logic, intensional programming, the implementing systems, and context-oriented and context-aware computing and so on that provide a contextual framework for the converging Core Lucid standard programming model. We are designing a standard specification of a baseline Lucid virtual machine for generic execution of Lucid programs. The resulting Core Lucid language would inherit the properties of generalization attempts of GIPL (1999-2013) and TransLucid (2008-2013) for all future and recent Lucid implementing systems to follow. We also maintain this work across local research group in order to foster deeper collaboration, maintain a list of recent and historical bibliography and a reference manual and reading list for students. We form a (for now informal) SIGLUCID group to keep track of this standard and historical records with eventual long-term goal through iterative revisions for this work to become a book or an encyclopedia of the referenced topics, and perhaps, an RFC. We first begin small with this initial set of notes.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.