Further results on the rainbow vertex-disconnection of graphs

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Abstract

Let GG be a nontrivial connected and vertex-colored graph. A subset XX of the vertex set of GG is called rainbow if any two vertices in XX have distinct colors. The graph GG is called \emph{rainbow vertex-disconnected} if for any two vertices xx and yy of GG, there exists a vertex subset SS such that when xx and yy are nonadjacent, SS is rainbow and xx and yy belong to different components of G−SG-S; whereas when xx and yy are adjacent, S+xS+x or S+yS+y is rainbow and xx and yy belong to different components of (G−xy)−S(G-xy)-S. Such a vertex subset SS is called a \emph{rainbow vertex-cut} of GG. For a connected graph GG, the \emph{rainbow vertex-disconnection number} of GG, denoted by rvd(G)rvd(G), is the minimum number of colors that are needed to make GG rainbow vertex-disconnected. In this paper, we obtain bounds of the rainbow vertex-disconnection number of a graph in terms of the minimum degree and maximum degree of the graph. We give a tighter upper bound for the maximum size of a graph GG with rvd(G)=krvd(G)=k for k≥n2k\geq\frac{n}{2}. We then characterize the graphs of order nn with rainbow vertex-disconnection number n−1n-1 and obtain the maximum size of a graph GG with rvd(G)=n−1rvd(G)=n-1. Moreover, we get a sharp threshold function for the property rvd(G(n,p))=nrvd(G(n,p))=n and prove that almost all graphs GG have rvd(G)=rvd(G‾)=nrvd(G)=rvd(\overline{G})=n. Finally, we obtain some Nordhaus-Gaddum-type results: n−5≤rvd(G)+rvd(G‾)≤2nn-5\leq rvd(G)+rvd(\overline{G})\leq 2n and n−1≤rvd(G)⋅rvd(G‾)≤n2n-1\leq rvd(G)\cdot rvd(\overline{G})\leq n^2 for the rainbow vertex-disconnection numbers of nontrivial connected graphs GG and G‾\overline{G} with order n≥24n\geq 24.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.