Paper detail

Further improvements to incidence and Beck-type bounds over prime finite fields

We establish improved finite field Szemeredi-Trotter and Beck type theorems. First we show that if P and L are a set of points and lines respectively in the plane F_p^2, with |P|,|L| \leq N and N<p, then there are at most C_1 N^{3/2-1/662+o(1)} incidences between points in P and lines in L. Here C_1 is some absolute constant greater than 1. This improves on the previously best-known bound of C_1 N^{3/2-1/806+o(1)}. Second we show that if P is a set of points in \mathbb{F}_p^2 with |P|<p then either at least C_2|P|^{1-o(1)} points in P are contained in a single line, or P determines least C_2 |P|^{1+1/109-o(1)} distinct lines. Here C_2 is an absolute constant less than 1. This improves on previous results in two ways. Quantitatively, the exponent of 1+1/109-o(1) is stronger than the previously best-known exponent of 1+1/267. And qualitatively, the result applies to all subsets of F_p^2 satisfying the cardinality condition; the previously best-known result applies only when P is of the form P=A*A for A \subseteq F_p.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.