Paper detail

Further Improvements for SAT in Terms of Formula Length

In this paper, we prove that the general CNF satisfiability problem can be solved in $O^*(1.0638^L)$ time, where $L$ is the length of the input CNF-formula (i.e., the total number of literals in the formula), which improves the previous result of $O^*(1.0652^L)$ obtained in 2009. Our algorithm was analyzed by using the measure-and-conquer method. Our improvements are mainly attributed to the following two points: we carefully design branching rules to deal with degree-5 and degree-4 variables to avoid previous bottlenecks; we show that some worst cases will not always happen, and then we can use an amortized technique to get further improvements. In our analyses, we provide some general frameworks for analysis and several lower bounds on the decreasing of the measure to simplify the arguments. These techniques may be used to analyze more algorithms based on the measure-and-conquer method.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.