Paper detail

Further analysis of metagenomic datasets containing GD and GX pangolin CoVs indicates widespread contamination, undermining pangolin host attribution

The only animals other than bats reported to have been infected with SARS-CoV-2-related coronaviruses (SARS2r-CoVs) prior to the COVID-19 pandemic are pangolins. In early 2020 multiple papers reported the identification of two clades of SARS2r-CoVs, GD and GX, infecting pangolins. However the RNA-Seq datasets supporting pangolin genome assembly were widely contaminated, contained synthetic vectors or were heavily enriched or filtered with little but coronavirus sequences left in the datasets. Here we investigate two pangolin fecal samples sequenced by Li et al. (2021) provided in support of GD PCoV infection of pangolins in Guangdong and find the read distribution consistent with PCR amplicon contamination and SARS-CoV-2 contamination, and further identify the presence of synthetic plasmid sequences. We also build upon our previous work to further analyze the dataset GX/P3B by Lam et al. (2020), which is the only non enriched/heavily filtered pangolin tissue dataset sequenced by Lam et al. (2020). We identify synthetic vectors and confirm human genomic origin samples in the dataset. Finally, we find human mitochondrial sequences in all pangolin organ datasets and mouse and tiger mitochondrial sequences in selected pangolin organ datasets sequenced by Liu et al. (2019). We infer that human and mouse genomic origin sequences were probably sourced from contamination prior to sequencing, while tiger origin sequence contamination may have occurred due to index hopping during sequencing. These observations are problematic for attributing pangolins as SARS2r-CoV hosts in the datasets examined. The forensic methods developed and used here can be applied to examine any third party SRA data sets.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.