Paper detail

Fundamental properties of solar-like oscillating stars from frequencies of minimum $Δν$ : II. Model computations for different chemical compositions and mass

The large separations between the oscillation frequencies of solar-like stars are measures of stellar mean density. The separations have been thought to be mostly constant in the observed range of frequencies. However, detailed investigation shows that they are not constant, and their variations are not random but have very strong diagnostic potential for our understanding of stellar structure and evolution. In this regard, frequencies of the minimum large separation are very useful tools. From these frequencies, in addition to the large separation and frequency of maximum amplitude, Yıldız et al. recently have developed new methods to find almost all the fundamental stellar properties. In the present study, we aim to find metallicity and helium abundances from the frequencies, and generalize the relations given by Yıldız et al. for a wider stellar mass range and arbitrary metallicity ($Z$) and helium abundance ($Y$). We show that the effect of metallicity is { significant} for most of the fundamental parameters. For stellar mass, for example, the expression must be multiplied by $(Z/Z_{\sun})^{0.12}$. For arbitrary helium abundance, $ M \propto (Y/Y_{\sun})^{0.25} $. Methods for determination of $Z$ and $Y$ from pure asteroseismic quantities are based on amplitudes (differences between maximum and minimum values of \Dnu) in the oscillatory component in the spacing of oscillation frequencies. Additionally, we demonstrate that the difference between the first maximum and the second minimum is very sensitive to $Z$. It also depends on $ν_{\rm min1}/ν_{\rm max}$ and small separation between the frequencies. Such a dependence leads us to develop a method to find $Z$ (and $Y$) from oscillation frequencies. The maximum difference between the estimated and model $Z$ values is about 14 per cent. It is 10 per cent for $Y$.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.