Paper detail

Fundamental properties of nearby stars and the consequences on DeltaY/DeltaZ

One of the greatest difficulties in astrophysics is the determination of the fundamental stellar parameters (FSPs), one of which is the initial mass fraction of helium (Y). However, given that Y can be measured spectroscopically in only a small percentage of stars, a linear relationship is assumed between Y and the mass fraction of metals (Z). This Y-Z relation is generally represented as Y=Yp+DY/DZxZ, with the value of the helium-to-metal enrichment ratio (DY/DZ) assumed as a constant. However, there is no fundamental reason for every star to have a Y value on a linear scale with Z. In this paper a method for determining the FSPs of nearby stars is presented that uses at the same time Mbol, Teff, and log g. One of these parameters is Y, which is used to determine the validity of the Y-Z relation. A new set of evolutionary tracks is created using the PGPUC stellar evolution code, which includes 7 masses (0.5<M/Msun<1.1), 7 helium abundances (0.230<Y<0.370), and 12 metallicities (1.6x10^-4<Z<6.0x10^-2) for solar-scaled chemical compositions ([alpha/Fe]=0.0). The suggested method is tested using two different spectroscopic databases of nearby main sequence stars with precise parallaxes, and spectroscopic measurements of [Fe/H], Teff and g. The proposed method is compared to other techniques used to determine the FSPs, where one assumes an age of 5 Gyr for all nearby stars. This comparison demonstrates that the hypothesis regarding constant age leads to an underestimation of the Y value, especially for low metallicities. In addition, the suggested method is limited to masses above 0.60 Msun and requires high-precision measurements of spectroscopic surface gravities in order to obtain reliable results. Finally, estimating masses and ages assuming a Y-Z relation rather than a free Y value may induce average errors of approximately 0.02 Msun and 2 Gyr, respectively.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.