Paper detail

The Fundamental Parameters of Four Massive Eclipsing Binaries in Westerlund 1

Only a small number of high mass stars (> 30 Mo) have fundamental parameters (i.e. masses and radii) measured with high enough accuracy from eclipsing binaries to constrain formation and evolutionary models of massive stars. This work aims to increase this limited sample, by studying the 4 massive eclipsing binary candidates discovered by Bonanos in the young massive cluster Westerlund 1. We present new follow-up echelle spectroscopy of these binaries and models of their light and radial velocity curves. We obtain fundamental parameters (i.e. masses, radii) for the 8 component stars, finding masses that span a range of 10-40 Mo, and contributing accurate fundamental parameters for 1 additional very massive star, the 33 Mo component of W13. WR77o is found to have a ~40 Mo companion, which provides a second dynamical constraint on the mass of the progenitor of the magnetar known in the cluster. We also use W13 to estimate the first, direct, eclipsing binary distance to Westerlund 1 and therefore the magnetar, and find it to be at 3.7 +/- 0.6 kpc. Our results confirm previous evidence for a high mass for the progenitor of the magnetar. In addition, the availability of eclipsing binaries with accurate parameters opens the way for direct, independent, high precision eclipsing binary distance measurements to Westerlund 1.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.