Paper detail

Fundamental parameters of Ap-star HD 108662

We present the results of a self-consistent spectroscopic analysis of the atmosphere of Ap-star HD 108662 based on high resolution spectrum and low resolution spectrophotometric observations. Magnetic field effects, such as Zeeman broadening and polarized line formation, were taking into account in the analysis of spectral line profiles. We derived abundances of 24 chemical elements as well as the stratification of Fe -- an element which is the main contributor to the line absorption in the visible wavelengths. Another abundant chemical element -- Chromium -- was found to be distributed homogeneously in the atmosphere of the star. From our analysis we determined the following fundamental parameters of HD~108662: $T_{eff}$ = 10212 K, log$g$ = 4.0, $R/R_{\odot}$ = 2.09 and log$(L/L_{\odot})$ = 1.63. The estimated rotational velocity of the star is $v\,sini$ = 20.4 km/s and the strength of the surface magnetic field is $B_s$ = 3300 G.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.