Paper detail

Fundamental Limits of Decentralized Data Shuffling

Data shuffling of training data among different computing nodes (workers) has been identified as a core element to improve the statistical performance of modern large-scale machine learning algorithms. Data shuffling is often considered as one of the most significant bottlenecks in such systems due to the heavy communication load. Under a master-worker architecture (where a master has access to the entire dataset and only communication between the master and the workers is allowed) coding has been recently proved to considerably reduce the communication load. This work considers a different communication paradigm referred to as decentralized data shuffling, where workers are allowed to communicate with one another via a shared link. The decentralized data shuffling problem has two phases: workers communicate with each other during the data shuffling phase, and then workers update their stored content during the storage phase. The main challenge is to derive novel converse bounds and achievable schemes for decentralized data shuffling by considering the asymmetry of the workers' storages (i.e., workers are constrained to store different files in their storages based on the problem setting), in order to characterize the fundamental limits of this problem. For the case of uncoded storage (i.e., each worker directly stores a subset of bits of the dataset), this paper proposes converse and achievable bounds (based on distributed interference alignment and distributed clique-covering strategies) that are within a factor of 3/2 of one another. The proposed schemes are also exactly optimal under the constraint of uncoded storage for either large storage size or at most four workers in the system.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.