Paper detail

Fundamental limitations to no-jerk gearshifts of multi-speed transmission architectures in electric vehicles

Multi-speed transmissions can enhance the performance and reduce the overall cost of an electric vehicle, but they also introduce a challenge: avoiding gearshift jerk, which may sometimes prove to be impossible in the presence of motor and clutch saturation. In this article, we introduce three theorems that explicitly define the fundamental limitations to no-jerk gearshifts resulting from motor or actuator saturation. We compare gearshifts that consist of transferring transmission torque from one friction clutch to another, to the case in which one of the clutches is a one-way clutch. We show that systems with a one-way clutch are more prone to motor saturation, causing gearshift jerk to be more often inevitable. We also study the influence of planetary gearsets on the gearshift dynamical trajectories, and expose the impact on the no-jerk limitations. This work offers tools to compare transmission architectures during the conceptual design phase of a new electric vehicle.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.