Paper detail

Fundamental Bounds and Approaches to Sequence Reconstruction from Nanopore Sequencers

Nanopore sequencers are emerging as promising new platforms for high-throughput sequencing. As with other technologies, sequencer errors pose a major challenge for their effective use. In this paper, we present a novel information theoretic analysis of the impact of insertion-deletion (indel) errors in nanopore sequencers. In particular, we consider the following problems: (i) for given indel error characteristics and rate, what is the probability of accurate reconstruction as a function of sequence length; (ii) what is the number of `typical' sequences within the distortion bound induced by indel errors; (iii) using replicated extrusion (the process of passing a DNA strand through the nanopore), what is the number of replicas needed to reduce the distortion bound so that only one typical sequence exists within the distortion bound. Our results provide a number of important insights: (i) the maximum length of a sequence that can be accurately reconstructed in the presence of indel and substitution errors is relatively small; (ii) the number of typical sequences within the distortion bound is large; and (iii) replicated extrusion is an effective technique for unique reconstruction. In particular, we show that the number of replicas is a slow function (logarithmic) of sequence length -- implying that through replicated extrusion, we can sequence large reads using nanopore sequencers. Our model considers indel and substitution errors separately. In this sense, it can be viewed as providing (tight) bounds on reconstruction lengths and repetitions for accurate reconstruction when the two error modes are considered in a single model.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.