Paper detail

Functions that preserve p-randomness

We show that polynomial-time randomness (p-randomness) is preserved under a variety of familiar operations, including addition and multiplication by a nonzero polynomial-time computable real number. These results follow from a general theorem: If $I$ is an open interval in the reals, $f$ is a function mapping $I$ into the reals, and $r$ in $I$ is p-random, then $f(r)$ is p-random provided 1. $f$ is p-computable on the dyadic rational points in $I$, and 2. $f$ varies sufficiently at $r$, i.e., there exists a real constant $C > 0$ such that either (a) $(f(x) - f(r))/(x-r) > C$ for all $x$ in $I$ with $x \ne r$, or (b) $(f(x) - f(r))(x-r) < -C$ for all $x$ in $I$ with $x \ne r$. Our theorem implies in particular that any analytic function about a p-computable point whose power series has uniformly p-computable coefficients preserves p-randomness in its open interval of absolute convergence. Such functions include all the familiar functions from first-year calculus.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.