Paper detail

Fully Dynamic $(1+ε)$-Approximate Matchings

We present the first data structures that maintain near optimal maximum cardinality and maximum weighted matchings on sparse graphs in sublinear time per update. Our main result is a data structure that maintains a $(1+ε)$ approximation of maximum matching under edge insertions/deletions in worst case $O(\sqrt{m}ε^{-2})$ time per update. This improves the 3/2 approximation given in [Neiman,Solomon,STOC 2013] which runs in similar time. The result is based on two ideas. The first is to re-run a static algorithm after a chosen number of updates to ensure approximation guarantees. The second is to judiciously trim the graph to a smaller equivalent one whenever possible. We also study extensions of our approach to the weighted setting, and combine it with known frameworks to obtain arbitrary approximation ratios. For a constant $ε$ and for graphs with edge weights between 1 and N, we design an algorithm that maintains an $(1+ε)$-approximate maximum weighted matching in $O(\sqrt{m} \log N)$ time per update. The only previous result for maintaining weighted matchings on dynamic graphs has an approximation ratio of 4.9108, and was shown in [Anand,Baswana,Gupta,Sen, FSTTCS 2012, arXiv 2012].

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.