Paper detail

Fully-automated deep learning slice-based muscle estimation from CT images for sarcopenia assessment

Objective: To demonstrate the effectiveness of using a deep learning-based approach for a fully automated slice-based measurement of muscle mass for assessing sarcopenia on CT scans of the abdomen without any case exclusion criteria. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study was conducted using a collection of public and privately available CT images (n = 1070). The method consisted of two stages: slice detection from a CT volume and single-slice CT segmentation. Both stages used Fully Convolutional Neural Networks (FCNN) and were based on a UNet-like architecture. Input data consisted of CT volumes with a variety of fields of view. The output consisted of a segmented muscle mass on a CT slice at the level of L3 vertebra. The muscle mass is segmented into erector spinae, psoas, and rectus abdominus muscle groups. The output was tested against manual ground-truth segmentation by an expert annotator. Results: 3-fold cross validation was used to evaluate the proposed method. The slice detection cross validation error was 1.41+-5.02 (in slices). The segmentation cross validation Dice overlaps were 0.97+-0.02, 0.95+-0.04, 0.94+-0.04 for erector spinae, psoas, and rectus abdominus, respectively, and 0.96+-0.02 for the combined muscle mass. Conclusion: A deep learning approach to detect CT slices and segment muscle mass to perform slice-based analysis of sarcopenia is an effective and promising approach. The use of FCNN to accurately and efficiently detect a slice in CT volumes with a variety of fields of view, occlusions, and slice thicknesses was demonstrated.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.