Paper detail

Full-scale validation of CFD simulations of buoyancy-driven ventilation in a three-story office building

Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is frequently used to support the design of naturally ventilated buildings; however, the model accuracy should be thoroughly assessed, ideally through validation with full-scale measurements. The present study aims to (1) validate transient CFD simulations with uncertainty quantification (UQ) for buoyancy-driven natural ventilation against full-scale experiments in an operational atrium building, and (2) quantify the sensitivity of the CFD results to the thermal boundary conditions. The UQ and sensitivity analysis consider uncertainties in the initial and boundary conditions for the temperatures. Considering the volume-averaged air temperature on each floor, the predictions and measurements agree well with discrepancies less than 0.3 °C. When considering the temperature averaged over smaller zones on each floor, two trends can be observed. First, in zones not adjacent to windows, the discrepancies between the CFD and measurements can be explained by uncertainty in the boundary conditions and the measurements. Second, in zones adjacent to windows, higher discrepancies are observed due to oscillations in the inflow jets just downstream of the windows, and due to geometrical simplifications in the CFD model. The sensitivity analysis demonstrates that the boundary conditions for the thermal mass surface temperature and the outdoor temperature have a dominant effect on the indoor air temperature predictions, with their relative importance varying as function of proximity to the windows.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.