Paper detail

Full information maximum likelihood estimation in factor analysis with a lot of missing values

We consider the problem of full information maximum likelihood (FIML) estimation in a factor analysis model when a majority of the data values are missing. The expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm is often used to find the FIML estimates, in which the missing values on observed variables are included in complete data. However, the EM algorithm has an extremely high computational cost when the number of observations is large and/or plenty of missing values are involved. In this paper, we propose a new algorithm that is based on the EM algorithm but that efficiently computes the FIML estimates. A significant improvement in the computational speed is realized by not treating the missing values on observed variables as a part of complete data. Our algorithm is applied to a real data set collected from a Web questionnaire that asks about first impressions of human; almost $90\%$ of the data values are missing. When there are many missing data values, it is not clear if the FIML procedure can achieve good estimation accuracy even if the number of observations is large. In order to investigate this, we conduct Monte Carlo simulations under a wide variety of sample sizes.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.