Paper detail

Full feature selection for estimating KAP radiation dose in coronary angiographies and percutaneous coronary interventions

In interventional cardiology (IC) the radiation dose variation is very significant, and its estimation has been difficult due to the complexity of the treatments. In order to tackle this problem, the aim of this study was to identify the most important demographic and clinical features to estimate Kerma-Area Product (KAP) radiation dose in coronary angiographies (CA) and percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). The study was retrospective using clinical patient data from 838 CA and PCI procedures. A total of 59 features were extracted from the patient data and 9 different filter-based feature selection methods were used to select the most informative features in terms of the KAP radiation dose from the treatments. The selected features were then used in a support vector regression (SVR) model to evaluate their performance in estimating the radiation dose. The ten highest-ranking features were: 1) FN1AC (CA), 2) FN2BA (PCI), 3) weight, 4) post-stenosis 0%, 5) multi-vessel disease, 6) number of procedures 3, 7) pre-stenosis 100%, 8) American Heart Association (AHA) score C, 9) pre-stenosis 85% and 10) gender. The performance of the SVR model increased (mean squared error ~ 450) with the number of features approximately up to 30 features. The identification of the most informative features for CA and PCI KAP is an important step in determining suitable complexity models for clinical practice. The highest-ranking features can be used as individual predictors of IC procedure KAP or can be incorporated into combined complexity score or different estimation models in the future.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.