Paper detail

Full 2D radiative transfer modelling of transitional disk LkCa 15

With the legacy of Spitzer and current advances in (sub)mm astronomy, a large number of &#39;transitional&#39; disks has been identified which are believed to contain gaps or have developped large inner holes, some filled with dust. This may indicate that complex geometries may be a key feature in disk evolution that has to be understood and modeled correctly. The disk around LkCa 15 is such a disk, with a gap ranging from ~5 - 50 AU, as identified by Espaillat et al. (2007) using 1+1D radiative transfer modelling. To fit the SED, they propose 2 possible scenarios for the inner (<5 AU) disk - optically thick or optically thin - and one scenario for the outer disk. We use the gapped disk of LkCa 15 as a showcase to illustrate the importance of 2D radiative transfer in transitional disks, by showing how the vertical dust distribution in dust-filled inner holes determines not only the radial optical depth but also the outer disk geometry. We use MCMax, a 2D radiative transfer code with a self-consistent vertical structure, to model the SED. We identify two possible geometries for the inner and outer disk, that are both different from those in Espaillat et al. (2007). An inner disk in hydrostatic equilibrium reprocesses enough starlight to fit the near infrared flux, but also casts a shadow on the inner rim of the outer disk. This requires the outer disk scale height to be large enough to rise out of the shadow. An optically thin inner disk does not cast such a shadow, and the SED can be fitted with a smaller outer disk scale height. For the dust in the inner regions to become optically thin however, the scale height would have to be so much larger than its hydrostatic equilibrium value that it effectively becomes a dust shell. It is currently unclear if a physical mechanism exists which could provide for such a configuration.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.