Paper detail

Frontrunning Block Attack in PoA Clique: A Case Study

As a fundamental technology of decentralized finance (DeFi), blockchain's ability to maintain a distributed fair ledger is threatened by manipulation of block/transaction order. In this paper, we propose a frontrunning block attack against the Clique-based Proof of Authority (PoA) algorithms. Our attack can frontrun blocks from honest in-turn sealers by breaking the proper order of leader selection. By falsifying the priority parameters (both \textit{difficulty} and \textit{delay time}), a malicious out-of-turn sealer can always successfully occupy the leader position and produce advantageous blocks that may contain profitable transactions. As a typical instance, we apply our attack to a mature Clique-engined project, HPB (\$3,058,901, as of April 2022). Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness and feasibility. Then, we further recommend fixes that make identity checks effective. Our investigation and suggestion have been submitted to its official team and got their approval. We believe this work can act as, at least, a warning case for Clique variants to avoid repeating these design mistakes.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.