Paper detail

From X-rays to physical parameters: a comprehensive analysis of thermal tidal disruption event X-ray spectra

We perform a comprehensive analysis of a population of 19 X-ray bright tidal disruption events (TDEs), fitting their X-ray spectra with a new, physically self consistent, relativistic accretion disc model. Not all of the TDEs inhabit regions of parameter space where the model is valid, or have sufficient data for a detailed analysis, and physically interpretable parameters for a sub-sample of 11 TDEs are determined. These sources have thermal (power-law free) X-ray spectra. The radial sizes measured from these spectra lie at values consistent with the inner-most stable circular orbit of black holes with masses given by the $M_{\rm BH}-σ$ relationship, and can be used as an independent measurement of $M_{\rm BH}$. The bolometric disc luminosity can also be inferred from X-ray data. All of the TDEs have luminosities which are sub-Eddington ($L_{\rm bol, disc} \lesssim L_{\rm edd}$), and larger than the typical hard-state transitional luminosity of X-ray binary discs ($L_{\rm bol, disc} \gtrsim 0.01 L_{\rm edd}$). The {\it peak} bolometric luminosity is found to be linearly correlated with the $M_{\rm BH}-σ$ mass. The TDE X-ray-to-bolometric correction can reach values up to $\sim 100$, and grows exponentially at late times, resolving the missing energy problem. We show that the peak disc luminosities of some TDEs are smaller than their observed optical luminosities, implying that not all of the early time optical emission can be sourced from reprocessed disc emission. Our results are supportive of the hypothesis that thermal X-ray bright TDEs are in accretion states analogous to the ``soft'' accretion state of X-ray binaries, and that black hole accretion processes are scale (mass) invariant.

preprint2023arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.