Paper detail

From variable density sampling to continuous sampling using Markov chains

Since its discovery over the last decade, Compressed Sensing (CS) has been successfully applied to Magnetic Reso- nance Imaging (MRI). It has been shown to be a powerful way to reduce scanning time without sacrificing image quality. MR images are actually strongly compressible in a wavelet basis, the latter being largely incoherent with the k-space or spatial Fourier domain where acquisition is performed. Nevertheless, since its first application to MRI [1], the theoretical justification of actual k-space sampling strategies is questionable. Indeed, the vast majority of k-space sampling distributions have been heuris- tically designed (e.g., variable density) or driven by experimental feasibility considerations (e.g., random radial or spiral sampling to achieve smoothness k-space trajectory). In this paper, we try to reconcile very recent CS results with the MRI specificities (mag- netic field gradients) by enforcing the measurements, i.e. samples of k-space, to fit continuous trajectories. To this end, we propose random walk continuous sampling based on Markov chains and we compare the reconstruction quality of this scheme to the state- of-the art.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.