Paper detail

From the molecular-cloud- to the embedded-cluster-mass function with a density threshold for star formation

The mass function of molecular clouds and clumps is shallower than the mass function of young star clusters, gas-embedded and gas-free alike, as their respective mass function indices are $β_0 \simeq 1.7$ and $β_\star \simeq 2$. We demonstrate that such a difference can arise from different mass-radius relations for the embedded-clusters and the molecular clouds (clumps) hosting them. In particular, the formation of star clusters with a constant mean {\it volume} density in the central regions of molecular clouds of constant mean {\it surface} density steepens the mass function from clouds to embedded-clusters. This model is observationally supported since the mean surface density of molecular clouds is approximately constant, while there is a growing body of evidence, in both Galactic and extragalactic environments, that efficient star-formation requires a hydrogen molecule number density threshold of $n_{th} \simeq 10^{4-5}\,cm^{-3}$. In the framework of the same model, the radius distribution steepens from clouds (clumps) to embedded-clusters, which contributes to explaining observed cluster radius distributions. [Abridged]

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.