Paper detail

From the Inner to Outer Milky Way: A Photometric Sample of 2.6 Million Red Clump Stars

Large pristine samples of red clump stars are highly sought after given that they are standard candles and give precise distances even at large distances. However, it is difficult to cleanly select red clumps stars because they can have the same T$_{\mathrm{eff}}$ and log $g$ as red giant branch stars. Recently, it was shown that the asteroseismic parameters, $\rmΔ$P and $\rm{Δν}$, which are used to accurately select red clump stars, can be derived from spectra using the change in the surface carbon to nitrogen ratio ([C/N]) caused by mixing during the red giant branch. This change in [C/N] can also impact the spectral energy distribution. In this study, we predict the $\rmΔ$P, $\rm{Δν}$, T$_{\mathrm{eff}}$ and log $g$ using 2MASS, AllWISE, \gaia, and Pan-STARRS data in order to select a clean sample of red clump stars. We achieve a contamination rate of $\sim$20\%, equivalent to what is achieved when selecting from T$_{\mathrm{eff}}$ and log $g$ derived from low resolution spectra. Finally, we present two red clump samples. One sample has a contamination rate of $\sim$ 20\% and $\sim$ 405,000 red clump stars. The other has a contamination of $\sim$ 33\% and $\sim$ 2.6 million red clump stars which includes $\sim$ 75,000 stars at distances $>$ 10 kpc. For |b|>30 degrees we find $\sim$ 15,000 stars with contamination rate of $\sim$ 9\%. The scientific potential of this catalog for studying the structure and formation history of the Galaxy is vast given that it includes millions of precise distances to stars in the inner bulge and distant halo where astrometric distances are imprecise.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.