Paper detail

From the Boltzmann $H$-theorem to Perelman's $W$-entropy formula for the Ricci flow

In 1870s, L. Boltzmann proved the famous $H$-theorem for the Boltzmann equation in the kinetic theory of gas and gave the statistical interpretation of the thermodynamic entropy. In 2002, G. Perelman introduced the notion of $W$-entropy and proved the $W$-entropy formula for the Ricci flow. This plays a crucial role in the proof of the no local collapsing theorem and in the final resolution of the Poincaré conjecture and Thurston's geometrization conjecture. In our previous paper \cite{Li11a}, the author gave a probabilistic interpretation of the $W$-entropy using the Boltzmann-Shannon-Nash entropy. In this paper, we make some further efforts for a better understanding of the mysterious $W$-entropy by comparing the $H$-theorem for the Boltzmann equation and the Perelman $W$-entropy formula for the Ricci flow. We also suggest a way to construct the "density of states" measure for which the Boltzmann $H$-entropy is exactly the $W$-entropy for the Ricci flow.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.