Paper detail

From pQCD to neutron stars: matching equations of state to constrain global star properties

The equation of state (EoS) of quantum chromodynamics (QCD) at zero temperature can be calculated in two different perturbative regimes: for small values of the baryon chemical potential $μ$, one may use chiral perturbation theory (ChEFT); and for large values of $μ$, one may use perturbative QCD (pQCD). There is, however, a gap for $μ\in (0.97\text{ GeV},\, 2.6\text{ GeV})$, where these theories becomes non-perturbative, and where there is currently no known microscopic description of QCD matter. Unfortunately, this interval obscures the values of $μ$ found within the cores of neutron stars (NSs). In this thesis, we argue that thermodynamic matching of the ChEFT and pQCD EoSs is a legitimate way to obtain quantitative constraints on the non-pertubative QCD EoS. Moreover, we argue that this method is effective, verifiable, and systematically improvable. First, we carry out a simplified matching procedure in QCD-like theories that can be simulated on the lattice without a sign problem. Our calculated pressure band serves as a prediction for lattice-QCD practitioners and will allow them to verify or refute the simplified procedure. Second, we apply the state-of-the-art matched EoS of Kurkela et al. (2014) to rotating NSs. This allows us to obtain bounds on observable NS properties, as well as point towards future observations that would more tightly constrain the current state-of-the-art EoS band. Finally, as evidence of the ability to improve the procedure, we carry out calculations in pQCD to improve the zero-temperature pressure. We calculate the full $\mathcal{O}(g^{6} \ln^{2} g)$ contribution to the pQCD pressure for $n_{f}$ massless quarks, as well as a significant portion of the $\mathcal{O}(g^{6} \ln g)$ piece and even some of the $\mathcal{O}(g^{6})$ piece.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.