Paper detail

From $p$-Wasserstein Bounds to Moderate Deviations

We use a new method via $p$-Wasserstein bounds to prove Cramér-type moderate deviations in (multivariate) normal approximations. In the classical setting that $W$ is a standardized sum of $n$ independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) random variables with sub-exponential tails, our method recovers the optimal range of $0\leq x=o(n^{1/6})$ and the near optimal error rate $O(1)(1+x)(\log n+x^2)/\sqrt{n}$ for $P(W>x)/(1-Φ(x))\to 1$, where $Φ$ is the standard normal distribution function. Our method also works for dependent random variables (vectors) and we give applications to the combinatorial central limit theorem, Wiener chaos, homogeneous sums and local dependence. The key step of our method is to show that the $p$-Wasserstein distance between the distribution of the random variable (vector) of interest and a normal distribution grows like $O(p^αΔ)$, $1\leq p\leq p_0$, for some constants $α, Δ$ and $p_0$. In the above i.i.d. setting, $α=1, Δ=1/\sqrt{n}, p_0=n^{1/3}$. For this purpose, we obtain general $p$-Wasserstein bounds in (multivariate) normal approximations using Stein's method.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.