Paper detail

From Organization to Viability: A Multi-Level Analysis of Gait Dynamics Under Occlusal Constraint

Clinical interpretation often assumes that observable performance provides sufficient information about the organization of an adaptive system. However, similar observable performance may correspond to distinct latent organizations. This study extends a previous multi-level framework by introducing a fourth analytical level centered on longitudinal viability. Using an exploratory single-case design in a Parkinsonian patient, gait data were recorded with instrumented insoles under three occlusal conditions: neutral natural occlusion (ONL), a 2.5-degree increase in vertical dimension of occlusion (OC2.5), and a 3-degree increase in vertical dimension of occlusion (OC3). Two measurement sessions were conducted eleven weeks apart, during which the participant underwent a structured sensorimotor intervention. The vertical dimension of occlusion was considered as an experimentally varied constraint applied to an adaptive neuromechanical system. Although observable performance remained globally comparable across conditions, PCA-based latent-space analysis revealed differentiated longitudinal centroid displacements. OC3 exhibited the smallest displacement, ONL an intermediate displacement, and OC2.5 the largest displacement. This hierarchy supports the relevance of a Level 4 framework centered on viability, understood here as an exploratory proxy for a configuration's capacity to maintain lower longitudinal reorganization over time. These findings remain within-subject, exploratory, and non-causal. They do not establish a validated clinical threshold, causal occlusal effect, or therapeutic optimum. More generally, the work suggests that clinical relevance cannot be inferred solely from instantaneous performance or static latent structure, but may also depend on the capacity of a configuration to sustain a coherent trajectory over time.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.