Paper detail

From IRAS to IRS: Evolution of the Most Luminous Galaxies in the Universe

We summarize observations with the Spitzer Infrared Spectrograph (IRS) of 571 starbursts (strong PAH emission features), 128 obscured AGN (strong silicate absorption), and 39 unobscured AGN (silicate emission). Sources range in luminosity from 10^{8} to 10^{14} solar luminosities and continuously in redshift for 0 < z < 3. The most luminous starbursts and AGN evolve as (1+z)^{2.5} to z ~ 2.5; no clear evidence is found that this evolution ceases beyond z = 2.5. Dust obscuration in starbursts is determined by comparing PAH luminosity with ultraviolet luminosity and indicates severe obscuration in most starbursts, even those selected in the ultraviolet; the median ratio (intrinsic ultraviolet/observed ultraviolet) is ~ 50 for infrared selected starbursts and ~ 8 for ultraviolet selected starbursts. Obscuration increases with bolometric luminosity, but starbursts which appear most luminous in the ultraviolet are those with the least obscuration. This result indicates that extinction corrections are significantly underestimated for ultraviolet selected sources, suggesting that galaxies at z ~> 2 are more luminous than deduced only from rest frame ultraviolet observations.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.