Paper detail

From Invariants to Canonization in Parallel

A function $f$ of a graph is called a complete graph invariant if the isomorphism of graphs $G$ and $H$ is equivalent to the equality $f(G)=f(H)$. If, in addition, $f(G)$ is a graph isomorphic to $G$, then $f$ is called a canonical form for graphs. Gurevich proves that graphs have a polynomial-time computable canonical form exactly when they have a polynomial-time computable complete invariant. We extend this equivalence to the polylogarithmic-time model of parallel computation for classes of graphs with bounded rigidity index and for classes of graphs with small separators. In particular, our results apply to three representative classes of graphs embeddable into a fixed surface, namely, to 5-connected graphs, to 3-connected graphs admitting a polyhedral embedding, and 3-connected graphs admitting a large-edge-width embedding. Another application covers graphs with bounded treewidth. Since in the latter case an NC complete-invariant algorithm is known, we conclude that graphs of bounded treewidth have a canonical form (and even a canonical labeling) computable in NC.

preprint2007arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.