Paper detail

From high $p_\perp$ theory and data to inferring anisotropy of Quark-Gluon Plasma

High $p_\perp$ theory and data are commonly used to study high $p_\perp$ parton interactions with QGP, while low $p_\perp$ data and corresponding models are employed to infer QGP bulk properties. On the other hand, with a proper description of high $p_\perp$ parton-medium interactions, high $p_\perp$ probes become also powerful tomography tools, since they are sensitive to global QGP features, such as different temperature profiles or initial conditions. This tomographic role of high $p_\perp$ probes can be utilized to assess the spatial anisotropy of the QCD matter. With our dynamical energy loss formalism, we show that a (modified) ratio of $R_{AA}$ and $v_2$ presents a reliable and robust observable for straightforward extraction of initial state anisotropy. We analytically estimated the proportionality between the $v_2/(1-R_{AA})$ and anisotropy coefficient $ε_{2L}$, and found surprisingly good agreement with full-fledged numerical calculations. Within the current error bars, the extraction of the anisotropy from the existing data using this approach is still inaccessible. However, with the expected accuracy improvement in the upcoming LHC runs, the anisotropy of the QGP formed in heavy ion collisions can be straightforwardly derived from the data. Such a data-based anisotropy parameter would present an important test to models describing the initial stages of heavy-ion collision and formation of QGP, and demonstrate the usefulness of high $p_\perp$ theory and data in obtaining QGP properties.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access8 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.