Paper detail

From Easy to Hard: Two-stage Selector and Reader for Multi-hop Question Answering

Multi-hop question answering (QA) is a challenging task requiring QA systems to perform complex reasoning over multiple documents and provide supporting facts together with the exact answer. Existing works tend to utilize graph-based reasoning and question decomposition to obtain the reasoning chain, which inevitably introduces additional complexity and cumulative error to the system. To address the above issue, we propose a simple yet effective novel framework, From Easy to Hard (FE2H), to remove distracting information and obtain better contextual representations for the multi-hop QA task. Inspired by the iterative document selection process and the progressive learning custom of humans, FE2H divides both the document selector and reader into two stages following an easy-to-hard manner. Specifically, we first select the document most relevant to the question and then utilize the question together with this document to select other pertinent documents. As for the QA phase, our reader is first trained on a single-hop QA dataset and then transferred into the multi-hop QA task. We comprehensively evaluate our model on the popular multi-hop QA benchmark HotpotQA. Experimental results demonstrate that our method ourperforms all other methods in the leaderboard of HotpotQA (distractor setting).

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.