Paper detail

From Clouds to Hallucinations: Atmospheric Retrieval Hijacking in Remote Sensing Vision-Language RAG

Multimodal RAG systems increasingly rely on vision-language retrievers to ground visual queries in external textual evidence. Existing adversarial studies on RAG mainly manipulate the retrieval corpus or memory, while attacks on vision-language and remote sensing models typically target end-task predictions. Input-space threats to the evidence retrieval stage of remote sensing multimodal RAG remain underexplored. To address this gap, we introduce CloudWeb, an atmospheric retrieval hijacking attack that modifies only the input image while keeping the retriever, generator, and knowledge base fixed at deployment. CloudWeb overlays parameterized cloud- and haze-like patterns on remote sensing images and optimizes them with a retrieval-oriented objective that pulls adversarial image embeddings toward target atmospheric evidence, suppresses source-scene evidence, enforces rank separation, and regularizes naturalness and coverage. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study of retrieval-stage atmospheric evidence hijacking in remote sensing multimodal RAG. We evaluate CloudWeb on a seven-dataset remote sensing RAG benchmark with five CLIP-style retrievers, including GeoRSCLIP, RemoteCLIP, OpenAI CLIP, and OpenCLIP, together with downstream vision-language generators. Across retrievers, CloudWeb consistently outperforms clean retrieval, handcrafted atmospheric baselines, random cloud perturbations, and fixed variants in injecting weather-related evidence into top-ranked results. On GeoRSCLIP ViT-B/32, Weather@5 increases from 0.71\% to 43.29\%. Downstream generation further shows measurable weather hallucination and semantic shift, indicating that retrieval-stage hijacking can propagate to the final RAG response. These findings reveal a practical failure mode: natural-looking atmospheric changes can compromise evidence retrieval before generation begins.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.