Paper detail

From Classical Fields to Two-Fluid Model of Superfluidity: Emergent Kinetics and Local Gauge Transformations

The first successful macroscopic theory for the motion of superfluid helium was that of Lev Landau (1941) in which the fluid is modelled phenomenologically as an interpenetrating mixture of a superfluid and a normal fluid. It has later been shown that Landau's two-fluid model can be rigorously derived from a one-fluid model within the classical fields approximation. Assuming a separation of scales exists between the slowly varying, large-scale, background (condensate) field, and the short rapidly evolving excitations, a full description of the kinetics between the condensate and the thermal cloud can be obtained. The kinetics describes three-wave and four-wave interactions that resemble the C_{12} and C_{22} terms, respectively, in the collision integral of the ZNG theory. The scale separation assumption precludes analysis of the healing layer and thus does not include the dynamics of quantised vortices. Whilst the analysis required the use of small parameters arising from the scale separation assumption and the assumption of a weakly depleted condensate, we expect the results to hold true over a wider range of parameters. This belief is motivated by the validity of Landau's two-fluid model which can be derived from a one-fluid model using nothing more than Galilean invariance principles. Indeed, we argue that similar arguments can be used to recover a two-fluid model directly from a classical field simply by invoking a local gauge transformation. This derivation does not require any small parameters to be introduced suggesting that the results that lead to the kinetic equations may turn out to be more general.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.