Paper detail

From building blocks of proteins to drugs: A quantum chemical study on structure-property relationships of phenylalanine, tyrosine and dopa

Density functional theory and ab initio methods have been employed to address the impacts of hydroxyl (OH) group substitutions on the physico-chemical properties of levodopa (or L-dopa) against the natural amino acids, phenylalanine and tyrosine. L-dopa, which is an important therapeutic drug for Parkinson's disease, shares structural homology with the amino acids, whose structures differ only by OH substitutions in their phenyl side chains. It is revealed that the backbone geometries of the aromatic molecules do not show apparent OH-dependent differences; however, their other molecular-level properties, such as molecular dipole moment, electronic properties and aromaticity, change significantly. The core binding energy spectra indicate that the atom sites that undergo modifications exhibit large energy shifts, so as to accommodate the changes in the intra-molecular chemical environment of the molecules. The binding energies of the modified C 1s sites in the molecules shift as much as 1.8 eV, whereas the electronic changes in their O 1s spectra happen in the higher energy region (ca. 536 eV). The valence spectra provide enhanced insights on the reactivity and chemical properties of the aromatic molecules. The impacts of OH moieties on the valence spectra are predominantly focussed in the energy band<16 eV, where the frontier molecular orbitals display much reorganization and energy shifts from the amino acids to L-dopa. Of the three molecules, L-dopa also has the least HOMO-LUMO energy gap, which can readily explain its proactivity as a drug compound. Furthermore, the nuclear independent chemical shift calculations suggest that L-dopa also has more aromaticity features than those of the amino acids. The OH groups, therefore, play a more prominent role in shaping the physico-chemical properties of L-dopa, which significantly improve its drug potency.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.