Paper detail

Frequency-Dependent Constraints on Cosmic Birefringence from the LFI and HFI Planck Data Release 4

We present new constraints on the frequency dependence of the cosmic birefringence angle from the Planck data release 4 polarization maps. An axion field coupled to electromagnetism predicts a nearly frequency-independent birefringence angle, $β_ν= β$, while Faraday rotation from local magnetic fields and Lorentz violating theories predict a cosmic birefringence angle that is proportional to the frequency, $ν$, to the power of some integer $n$, $β_ν\propto ν^n$. In this work, we first sample $β_ν$ individually for each polarized HFI frequency band in addition to the 70 GHz channel from the LFI. We also constrain a power-law formula for the birefringence angle, $β_ν=β_0(ν/ν_0)^n$, with $ν_0 = 150$ GHz. For a nearly full-sky measurement, $f_{\text{sky}}=0.93$, we find $β_0 = 0.26^{\circ}\pm0.11^\circ$ $(68\% \text{ C.L.})$ and $n=-0.45^{+0.61}_{-0.82}$ when we ignore the intrinsic $EB$ correlations of the polarized foreground emission, and $β_0 = 0.33^\circ \pm 0.12^\circ$ and $n=-0.37^{+0.49}_{-0.64}$ when we use a filamentary dust model for the foreground $EB$. Next, we use all the polarized Planck maps, including the 30 and 44 GHz frequency bands. These bands have a negligible foreground contribution from polarized dust emission. We, therefore, treat them separately. Without any modeling of the intrinsic $EB$ of the foreground, we generally find that the inclusion of the 30 and 44 GHz frequency bands raises the measured values of $β_ν$ and tightens $n$. At nearly full-sky, we measure $β_0=0.29^{\circ+0.10^\circ}_{\phantom{\circ}-0.11^\circ}$ and $n=-0.35^{+0.48}_{-0.47}$. Assuming no frequency dependence, we measure $β=0.33^\circ \pm 0.10^\circ$. If our measurements have effectively mitigated the $EB$ of the foreground, our constraints are consistent with a mostly frequency-independent signal of cosmic birefringence.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.