Paper detail

Frequency-dependent admittance of a short superconducting weak link

We consider the linear and non-linear electromagnetic responses of a nanowire connecting two bulk superconductors. Andreev states appearing at a finite phase bias substantially affect the finite-frequency admittance of such a wire junction. Electron transitions involving Andreev levels are easily saturated, leading to the nonlinear effects in photon absorption for the sub-gap photon energies. We evaluate the complex admittance analytically at arbitrary frequency and arbitrary, possibly non-equilibrium, occupation of Andreev levels. Special care is given to the limits of a single-channel contact and a disordered metallic weak link. We also evaluate the quasi-static fluctuations of admittance induced by fluctuations of the occupation factors of Andreev levels. In view of possible qubit applications, we compare properties of a weak link with those of a tunnel Josephson junction. Compared to the latter, a weak link has smaller low-frequency dissipation. However, because of the deeper Andreev levels, the low-temperature quasi-static fluctuations of the inductance of a weak link are exponentially larger than of a tunnel junction. These fluctuations limit the applicability of nanowire junctions in superconducting qubits.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.