Paper detail

Free-floating or wide-orbit? Keck adaptive-optics observations of free-floating planet candidates detected with gravitational microlensing

Recent detections of extremely short-timescale microlensing events imply the existence of a large population of Earth- to Neptune-mass planets that appear to have no host stars. However, it is currently unknown whether these objects are truly free-floating planets or whether they are in wide orbits around a distant host star. Here, we present an analysis of high-resolution imaging observations of five free-floating planet candidates collected with the Keck telescope. If these candidates were actually wide-orbit planets, then the light of the host would appear at a separation of 40-60 mas from the microlensing source star. No such stars are detected. We carry out injection and recovery simulations to estimate the sensitivity to putative host stars at different separations. Depending on the object, the presented observations rule out 11%-36\% of potential hosts assuming that the probability of hosting a planet does not depend on the host mass. The results are sensitive to the latter assumption, and the probability of detecting the host star in the analyzed images may be a factor of 1.9 +/- 0.1 larger, if the exoplanet hosting probability scales as the first power of the host star mass, as suggested by recent studies of planetary microlensing events. We argue that deeper observations, for example with JWST, are needed to confidently confirm or refute the free-floating planet hypothesis.

preprint2023arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.