Paper detail

Free energy dependence on spatial geometry for (2+1)-dimensional QFTs

We consider (2+1)-QFT at finite temperature on a product of time with a static spatial geometry. The suitably defined difference of thermal vacuum free energy for the QFT on a deformation of flat space from its value on flat space is a UV finite quantity, and for reasonable fall-off conditions on the deformation is IR finite too. For perturbations of flat space we show this free energy difference goes quadratically with perturbation amplitude and may be computed from the linear response of the stress tensor. As an illustration we compute it for a holographic CFT finding that at any temperature, and for any perturbation, the free energy decreases. Similar behaviour was previously found for free scalars and fermions, and for unitary CFTs at zero temperature, suggesting (2+1)-QFT may generally energetically favour a crumpled spatial geometry. We also treat the deformation in a hydrostatic small curvature expansion relative to the thermal scale. Then the free energy variation is determined by a curvature correction to the stress tensor and for these theories is negative for small curvature deformations of flat space.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.