Paper detail

Dust release and tensile strength of the non-volatile layer of cometary nuclei

We developed a thermophysical model for cometary nuclei, which is based upon the assumption that comets form by the gravitational instability of an ensemble of dust and ice aggregates. Under this condition, the tensile strength of the ice-free outer layers of a cometary nucleus can be calculated, using the dust-aggregate collision and adhesion model of Weidling et al. (2011). Based on available laboratory data on the gas permeability and thermal conductivity of ice-free dust layers, we derived the temperature and pressure at the dust-ice interface for pure water and pure carbon dioxide ice. Comparison of the vapor pressure below the dust crust with its tensile strength allows the prediction of dust release from cometary surfaces. Our model predicts dust activity for pure CO2 ice and for heliocentric distances of <~ 3 AU, whereas pure H2O ice cannot explain the dust emission

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.