Paper detail

FRBs: the Dispersion Measure of Host Galaxies

Using the results of the IllustrisTNG simulation we estimate the dispersion measure which may be attributed to halos of so called host galaxies of fast radio bursts sources (FRBs). Our results show that in contradiction to assumptions used to show the applicability of FRBs to cosmological tests, both the dispersion measure and its standard deviation calculated for host galaxies with given stellar mass in general increase with the redshift. The effect is not strong and cosmological tests using FRBs will be possible, but to preserve the level of statistical uncertainty the number of FRBs with known redshift in a sample should be increased by 15%--35% depending on circumstances. We show various statistical characteristics of ionized gas surrounding galaxies, the resulting dispersion measure and their dependence on the host galaxy stellar mass, redshift, and the projected distance of a FRB source from its host center. Cosmology: theory -- Galaxies: halos -- large-scale structure of Universe

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.