Paper detail

Frame Based Codes for Partially Active NOMA

Non-orthogonal multiple-access (NOMA) is a leading technology which gain a lot of interest this past several years. It enables larger user density and therefore is suited for modern systems such as 5G and IoT. In this paper we examined different frame-based codes for a partially active NOMA system. It is a more realistic setting where only part of the users, in an overly populated system, are active simultaneously. We introduce a new analysis approach were the active user ratio, a system's feature, is kept constant and different sized frames are employed. The frame types were partially derived from previous papers on the subject [1][2] and partially novel such as the LPF and the Steiner ETF. We learned the best capacity achieving frame depends on the active user ratio and three distinct ranges where defined. In addition, we introduced a measure called practical capacity which is the maximal rate achieved by simple coding scheme. ETFs always achieve the best practical capacity while LPFs and sparse frames are worse than a random one.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.