Paper detail

Fragmentation of shells: An analogy with the crack formation in tree bark

How does a shell explode into a series of fragments upon impact? The well accepted explanation is Mott's theory, which considers the fragmentation of shells as a random process controlled by defects. However, Mott's theory is inadequate due to its assumption of energy conversion, and it is incapable of explaining the lack of change in saturation fragment length with the increase in expansion velocity. In this paper, we present a theory to explain the physical mechanism for fragmentation of shells and propose a highly efficient model for predicting the number of necks after fragmentation. We recognize that the fragmentation problem in shells is analogous to the cracking behavior of tree bark, and closed form solutions is obtained to describe the relationship between the expansion velocity and the number of necks with consideration of the strain rate dependent strength of the shell material. The theoretical results show excellent correlation with the experimental results.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.