Paper detail

Fragmentation of protoplanetary disks around M-dwarfs

We investigate the conditions required for planet formation via gravitational instability (GI) and protoplanetary disk (PPD) fragmentation around M-dwarfs. Using a suite of 64 SPH simulations with $10^6$ particles, the parameter space of disk mass, temperature, and radius is explored, bracketing reasonable values based on theory and observation. Our model consists of an equilibrium, gaseous, and locally isothermal disk orbiting a central star of mass $M_*=M_{sol}/3$. Disks with a minimum Toomre $Q$ of $Q_{min} \lesssim 0.9$ will fragment and form gravitationally bound clumps. Some previous literature has found $Q_{min} < 1.3-1.5$ to be sufficient for fragmentation. Increasing disk height tends to stabilize disks, and when incorporated into $Q$ as $Q_{eff}\propto Q(H/R)^α$ for $α=0.18$ is sufficient to predict fragmentation. Some discrepancies in the literature regarding $Q_{crit}$ may be due to different methods of generating initial conditions (ICs). A series of 15 simulations demonstrates that perturbing ICs slightly out of equilibrium can cause disks to fragment for higher $Q$. Our method for generating ICs is presented in detail. We argue that GI likely plays a role in PPDs around M-dwarfs and that disk fragmentation at large radii is a plausible outcome for these disks.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.